Review: ‘New 09’ at Australian Centre for Contemporary Art (ACCA), Melbourne

Exhibition dates: 17th March – 17th May, 2009

Curator: Charlotte Day

 

ACCA’s annual commissions exhibition – this year curated by Charlotte Day with new works from eight contemporary Australian artists including Justine Khamara, Brodie Ellis, Marco Fusinato, Simon Yates, Matthew Griffin, Benjamin Armstrong and Pat Foster and Jen Berean.

 

 

Simon Yates (Australian, b. 1973) 'Rhabdomancy' 2009 from the exhibition 'New 09' at Australian Centre for Contemporary Art (ACCA), Melbourne, March - May, 2009

 

Simon Yates (Australian, b. 1973)
Rhabdomancy
Tissue paper, wood, fishing rods, tape, string, electrical components, helium balloons dimensions variable
2009
Photo: Marcus Bunyan

 

 

“That’s what art is, he said, the story of a life in all its particularity. It’s the only thing that really is particular and personal. It’s the expression and, at the same time, the fabric of the particular. And what do you mean by the fabric of the particular? I asked, supposing he would answer: Art. I was also thinking, indulgently, that we were pretty drunk already and that it was time to go home. But my friend said: What I mean is the secret story … The secret story is the one we’ll never know, although we’re living it from day to day, thinking we’re alive, thinking we’ve got it all under control and the stuff we overlook doesn’t matter. But every damn thing matters! It’s just that we don’t realise. We tell ourselves that art runs on one track and life, our lives, on another, we don’t even realise that’s a lie.”


From the story “Dentist” from the book ‘Last Evenings on Earth’ by Roberto Bolaño1

 

“A work of art reminds you of who you are now”


Kepesh from the film ‘Elegy’

 

 

The curator Charlotte Day has assembled an interesting selection of artists for New 09 at ACCA, Melbourne. It is an exhibition whose ‘presences’ challenge through dark and light, sound and light, contemplation and silence. The journey is one of here and now moments that transport the viewer to states of being that address the fabric of the particular: doubt, anxiety and enlightenment crowd every corner. The particularities of the experience (material, social, psychological and imaginative) impinge on the viewers interior states of being transcending the very physicality and symbolic realism of the works.2

On entering the gallery you are greeted by Simon Yates self-propelled figures that make up the work Rhabdomancy (2009, above). Suspended, tethered, floating just above the floor the figures move eerily about the entrance to the gallery, startling people who have not seen them move before. They stand silent witness, a simulation of self in tissue paper searching for meaning by using a dowsing rod. The word rhabdomancy has as one of it’s meanings ‘the art or gift of prophecy (or the pretence of prophecy) by supernatural means’. Here the figures are divining and divination rolled into one: grounded they seek release through the balloons but through augury they become an omen or portent from which the future is foretold.

“… cutting and slicing in order to see them better, willing them into three dimensions; an attempt to cheat death, or rather, to ward off forgetting of them as they are/were and as I was when the work was made.”

~ Justine Khamara

In the first gallery, a very minimal installation by Justine Khamara of two fractured faces stare out at you from the wall, my favourite work of the show. These are unsettling faces, protruding towards you like some topographical map, one eyes screwed shut the other beadily following you as you walk around the gallery space. Here the images of brother and sister presence anterior, already formed subjects not through memory (as photographs normally do) but through the insistence of the their multiple here and now planes of existence. Rather than ‘forgetting’ the images authenticate their identity through their ongoing presence in an ever renewing present.3 Their dissection of reality, the affirmation of their presence (not the photographic absence of a lost subject) embodies their secret story on the viewer told through psychological and imaginative processes: how do they make me feel – about my life, my death and being, here, now.

The pathos of the show is continued with the next work Noosphere (2008) by Brodie Ellis (the noosphere is best described as a sort of collective consciousness of human-beings).4 In this work a video above the clouds is projected onto a circular shape on the ceiling in a darkened room. The emotional and the imaginative impact of the message on the audience is again disorientating and immediate. The images look across the clouds to vistas of setting suns, look down on the clouds and the sea and land below. The images first move one way and then another, disorientating the viewer and changing their perspective of the earth; these are alien views of the earth accompanied by heart beat like ambient music. The perspective of the circle also changes depending on where the viewer stands like some anamorphic distortion of reality. On a stand a beaded yoke for a horse adds to the metaphorical allegory of the installation.

In the next gallery is the literal climax to the exhibition, Marco Fusinato’s Aetheric Plexus (2009). (Aether: medium through which light propagates; Plexus: in vertebrates, a plexus is an area where nerves branch and rejoin and is also a network of blood vessels).

Consisting of scaffolding that forms a cross and supports large numbers of silver spotlights with visible wiring and sound system the installation seems innocuous enough at first. Walking in front of the work produces no effect except to acknowledge the dull glow of red from the banks of dormant lights trained on the viewer. The interaction comes not in random fashion but when the viewer walks to the peripheries of the gallery corners triggering the work – suddenly you are are blasted with white light and the furious sound of white noise for about 15 seconds: I jumped half out of my skin! Totally disorientated as though one has been placed in a blast furnace or a heavenly irradiated crematorium one wonders what has just happened to you and it takes some time to reorientate oneself back in the afterlife of the here and now. Again the immediacy of the work, the particularities of the experience affect your interior states of being.

After a video installation by Matt Griffin you wander into the next gallery where two works by Benjamin Armstrong inhabit the floor of the gallery. And I do mean inhabit. Made of blown glass forms and wax coated tree branches the works have a strange affect on the psyche, to me seemingly emanations from the deep subconscious. Twin glass hemispheres of what look like a brain are surrounded by clasping synaptic nerve endings that support an egg like glass protrusion – a thought bubble? a spirit emanation? These are wonderful contemplative but slightly disturbing objects that have coalesced into shape only in another form to melt and disappear: molten glass and melted wax dissipating the very form of our existence.

Finally we come to the three part installation by Pat Foster and Jen Berean (below). On the right of the photograph you can see three aluminium and glass doors, closed, sealed leading to another gallery. What you can’t see in the photograph is the three pieces of gaffer tape stretched across the glass doors, like they do on the building sites of new homes. No entry here. Above your head is a suspended matrix of aluminium and glass with some of the glass planes smashed. Clean, clinical, safe but smashed, secure but threatening the matrix presses down on the viewer. It reminded me of the vertical standing shards of the World Trade Centre set horizontal suspended overhead. Only the steel cable seemed to ruin the illusion and seemed out of place with the work. It would have been more successful if the matrix was somehow suspended with fewer tethers to increase the sense of downward pressure. Finally you sit on the aluminium benches and contemplate in silence all that has come before and wonder what just hit you in a tidal wave of feelings, immediacies and emotions. The Doing and Undoing of Things.

An interesting journey then, one to provoke thought and emotion.
The fabric of the particular. The pathos of the art-iculate.

My only reservations are about the presence, the immediacy, the surface of it all. How persistent will these stories be? Will the work sustain pertinent inquiry above and beyond the here and now, the shock and awe. Or will it be like a meal one eats and then finds one is full but empty at the same time. A journey of smoke and mirrors.

Dr Marcus Bunyan

 

1/ Bolano, Robert. Last Evenings on Earth. New Directions, 2007. Available on Amazon.

2/ Blair, French. The Artist, The Body. [Online] Cited on 12/04/2009. No longer available online

3/ Ibid.,

4/ “For Teilhard, the noosphere is best described as a sort of ‘collective consciousness’ of human-beings. It emerges from the interaction of human minds. The noosphere has grown in step with the organisation of the human mass in relation to itself as it populates the earth. As mankind organizes itself in more complex social networks, the higher the noosphere will grow in awareness.” From the concept of Nooshpere on Wikipedia.


Many thankx to ACCA for allowing me to publish the photographs in the posting. All Images © Dr Marcus Bunyan and ACCA.

     

     

    Justine Khamara (Australian, b. 1971) 'Dilated Concentrations' 2009 from the exhibition 'New 09' at Australian Centre for Contemporary Art (ACCA), Melbourne, March - May, 2009

    Justine Khamara (Australian, b. 1971) 'Dilated Concentrations' 2009  (detail) from the exhibition 'New 09' at Australian Centre for Contemporary Art (ACCA), Melbourne, March - May, 2009

    Justine Khamara (Australian, b. 1971) 'Dilated Concentrations' 2009  (detail) from the exhibition 'New 09' at Australian Centre for Contemporary Art (ACCA), Melbourne, March - May, 2009

    Justine Khamara (Australian, b. 1971) 'Dilated Concentrations' 2009  (detail) from the exhibition 'New 09' at Australian Centre for Contemporary Art (ACCA), Melbourne, March - May, 2009

     

    Justine Khamara (Australian, b. 1971)
    Dilated Concentrations
    2009
    UV print on laser cut stainless steel
    Photos: Marcus Bunyan

     

    Benjamin Armstrong (Australian, b. 1975) 'Hold Everything Dear I' 2008

     

    Benjamin Armstrong (Australian, b. 1975)
    Hold Everything Dear I
    2008
    Photo: Marcus Bunyan

     

    Pat Foster (Australian, b. 1981) and Jen Berean (Canadian, b. 1981) 'Untitled’ from the series ‘The Doing and Undoing of Things’ 2009

     

    Pat Foster (Australian, b. 1981) and Jen Berean (Canadian, b. 1981)
    Untitled from the series The Doing and Undoing of Things
    2009
    Aluminium, safety glass, steel cable
    Photo: Marcus Bunyan

     

    Pat Foster (Australian, b. 1981) and Jen Berean (Canadian, b. 1981) 'Untitled’ from the series ‘The Doing and Undoing of Things’ 2009 (detail)

     

    Pat Foster (Australian, b. 1981) and Jen Berean (Canadian, b. 1981)
    Untitled from the series The Doing and Undoing of Things (detail)
    2009
    Aluminium, safety glass, steel cable
    Photo: Marcus Bunyan

     

     

    Australian Centre for Contemporary Art (ACCA)
    111 Sturt Street
    Southbank
    Victoria 3006
    Australia

    Opening hours:
    Tuesday – Friday 10am – 5pm
    Saturday – Sunday 11am – 5pm
    Closed Monday

    ACCA website

    LIKE ART BLART ON FACEBOOK

    Back to top

    Review: ‘En Plein Air’ photographs by Siri Hayes at Gallerysmith, Melbourne

    Exhibition dates: 12th March – 18th April, 2009

     

    Siri Hayes (Australian, b. 1977) 'Gunnai man land' 2008 from the exhibition 'En Plein Air' photographs by Siri Hayes at Gallerysmith, Melbourne, March - April, 2009

     

    Siri Hayes (Australian, b. 1977)
    Gunnai man land
    2008

     

     

    A handsome group of large photographs in crisp white frames is displayed in the large space of Gallerysmith, Melbourne. Undoubtably they are well taken and printed photographs but conceptually their thematic development is confused. The photographs purport to investigate how industrialisation has changed the Gippsland landscape since colonisation whilst referencing human interactions that ‘are sometimes’ associated with Western art.

    Gunnai land man (above) is very effective in this quest juxtaposing as it does an Indigenous Australian and fallen tree on a bare track with a smoke billowing power station (symbolic of the industrialisation of the area) looming in the background. Other photographs are less successful. What a man flying a kite has to do with the pre-colonial Gippsland landscape is beyond me and the juxtapositional incongruity sought by the artist simply does not work, despite the presence of the power station on the plains in the distance. The symbology has more to do with Japanese art than it has to do with Western art.

    The conceptual narrative of the photograph Moe Madonna (below) works only partially as well. The destruction of the landscape has been caused by pastoralisation not industrialisation. In the image that Hayes is referencing the Madonna is front and centre set in an idyllic landscape. In the work by Hayes the incongruity has to be explained, has to be verbalised in text for the association to be didactically made. The interpretation leaves no room for personal reflection and when I looked at this image, the mother and child were so small in the landscape, the placement so obviously constructed that there incongruity turned to disbelief: namely that I simply did not believe the mise en scène being created.

    Other narratives are equally confusing. In Paper bag lovers (below) I had to ask the gallery director what was going on in the photograph because the bodies where so small in the landscape (in fact it looks like one body) and you can’t really see the paper bags on their heads because the bodies are just an amorphous mass containing no detail at all (you can just see the body in the photograph below in the mid distance just below the large central tree). Why paper bags anyway? If something intentionally odd and incongruous is sought to be portrayed in the landscape perhaps Hayes should look at the work of Eugene Meatyard (see below) to see a real subversion of the body/landscape dichotomy.

    The one standout photograph of the exhibition is Plein air explorers (below). This is confirmed in the sales of the show as all six prints of this photograph have been sold. One can see why!

    The title is perfect, the construction of the image faultless. The naked white man stands proudly surveying his conquered domain, the land, whilst around him artists (reminding me of the dilettantes of the Victorian age going on day trips), hunker down into the ground with their easels oblivious to the desiccated trees around them. Here the photographer just observes, doesn’t construct, the incongruity of it all. The artists draw the white man based on direct observation of him and not on their conceptions or conventional images or memories of him while ignoring their surroundings. Here is the paradox, the ironic perfect storm that the artist was conceptually seeking: the representation of landscape based upon direct observation “in the open air” ignored for a perfect white arse while on the horizon smoke stacks of a power station stand in silent witness to the present and imminent destruction of the world. What a photograph! Can I have one now please?

    Dr Marcus Bunyan


    Many thankx to Gallerysmith for allowing me to publish the photographs in the posting. Please click on the photographs for a larger version of the image.

     

     

    Siri Hayes (Australian, b. 1977) 'Moe Madonna' 2008 from the exhibition 'En Plein Air' photographs by Siri Hayes at Gallerysmith, Melbourne, March - April, 2009

     

    Siri Hayes (Australian, b. 1977)
    Moe Madonna
    2008

     

    Siri Hayes (Australian, b. 1977) 'Kite' 2008

     

    Siri Hayes (Australian, b. 1977)
    Kite
    2008

     

    Raphael (Italian, 1483-1520) 'Madonna of the Goldfinch' 1505-1506

     

    Raphael (Italian, 1483-1520)
    Madonna of the Goldfinch
    1505-1506
    Oil on panel
    107 x 77cm
    Galleria degli Uffizi

     

    Siri Hayes (Australian, b. 1977) 'Paper Bag Lovers' 2008

     

    Siri Hayes (Australian, b. 1977)
    Paper Bag Lovers
    2008

     

    Eugene Meatyard (American, 1925-1972) 'Lucybelle Crater & her 15-year-old son's friend, Lucybelle Crater' 1970-1971

     

    Eugene Meatyard (American, 1925-1972)
    Lucybelle Crater & her 15-year-old son’s friend, Lucybelle Crater
    1970-1971

     

    I have predominantly focused on the parts of the Gippsland landscape that have been impacted by white settlement. I have composed various human interactions that are sometimes associated with Western art and its construction. For example, Moe Madonna references Raphael’s Goldfinch Madonna. The narratives are intentionally odd and incongruous with the surrounding location. My son and I seem out-of-place in a barren paddock while the autumn mist shrouds distant gum trees and electricity pylons. The soil here has been compacted beyond repair by cattle hooves – an inappropriate animal in Australia’s delicate ecosystems. As we sit on this barren plain, I read to Oliver from a European pre-schooler book titled Autumn, creating an interesting juxtaposition with the antipodean equivalent season.

    The work in this exhibition considers the pre-colonial Gippsland landscape and how industrial ‘progress’ has altered it. Hopefully it provides pause for thought.

    Siri Hayes exhibition notes. March 2009

     

    Siri Hayes (Australian, b. 1977) 'Plein air explorers' 2008

     

    Siri Hayes (Australian, b. 1977)
    Plein air explorers
    2008

     

     

    Gallerysmith
    170-174 Abbotsford St,
    North Melbourne,
    Victoria, 3051 Australia

    Opening hours:
    Tuesday to Saturday, 11am – 5pm

    Gallerysmith website

    Siri Hayes website

    LIKE ART BLART ON FACEBOOK

    Back to top

    Around the galleries: Derek O’Connor at Karen Woodbury Gallery, Peter Cole ‘Elements + Memories’ at John Buckley Gallery, Melbourne

    April 2009

     

    In a mad dash around town I managed to see the Derek O’Connor and Peter Cole exhibitions before they finished and also the Siri Hayes En Plein Air exhibition of photographs at Gallerysmith (see next post).

    Marcus


    Please click on the art work for a larger version of the image.

     

    Derek O’Connor paintings at Karen Woodbury Gallery

    An intense show of small oil paintings that really draw you into their composition. They are paintings of tremendous energy and layering, the surface being in a constant state of flux. The paintings become metaphors for the bodies existence in space, corporeal landscapes full of sensation ‘neither rational nor cerebral’. They become a mediation and a meditation upon life itself – complex, convulsive, concentrated energy that focuses the viewers attention so that they cannot look away.

     

    Derek O'Connor (Australian born England, b. 1959) 'Horizontal' 2008 from the exhibition Derek O'Connor paintings at Karen Woodbury Gallery

     

    Derek O’Connor (Australian born England, b. 1959)
    Horizontal
    2008

     

    Derek O'Connor (Australian born England, b. 1959) 'Horizontal' 2008 from the exhibition Derek O'Connor paintings at Karen Woodbury Gallery

     

    Derek O’Connor (Australian born England, b. 1959)
    Horizontal
    2008

     

    “Working with his tools of palette knives and brushes, he sets into motion a train of repetitions, of speeds and slowness1 applying and scrapping paint away in an attempt to move from a position of not knowing towards knowing. He brings … an intense physical and mental awareness to the rhythms of his own movements, his own body. At such moments time seems to expand – to become infinite.

    In erasing from his project the world of appearances, Derek O’Connor embraces something else – the realm of ‘sensation’. Sensation is an open painterly expression which resists definition. The Modernist painter Paul Cezanne described sensation as a “logic of the senses” which is neither rational nor cerebral2 … For Derek, the subject of his painting appears to be the act of making itself. Here subject and object collapse (folding into itself) so that sensation is experienced through the materiality of paint, via the movements of the artists’ body to affect the bodies of others.”

    Paul Uhlmann from the catalogue essay

     

    1/ Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. A Thousand Plateaus. London: Continuum, 1987, pp. 292-300
    2/ Deleuze, G. The Logic of Sensation. London: Continuum, 2003, p. 42

     

    Derek O'Connor (Australian born England, b. 1959) 'Irregular' 2008

     

    Derek O’Connor (Australian born England, b. 1959)
    Irregular
    2008

     

    Karen Woodbury Gallery

    This gallery has closed.

     

    Peter Cole ‘Elements + Memories’ at John Buckley Gallery 18th March – 9th April 2009

    A decidedly underwhelming show by Peter Cole at John Buckley Gallery only redeemed by the amazing Elemental Landscape series of 64 small sculptural pieces displayed as a frieze (see below). The large free standing sculptural works fail to impress with their minimalist Ikea-esque cut out style – especially when viewed from the rear of the work. One would have thought that a sculptor, making several free standing pieces that are going to be walked around in a gallery space, would have designed the work to be viewed ‘in the round’. As it is all the perfection of the clinical front of the works is undone by brackets and screws holding the whole thing together when viewed from the flattened rump. This is pretty, surface work that lacks substance and insight, pretty shapes and cut outs and targets that allude to memory but are just stylised glossy magazine representations of it.

    On the other hand the Elemental Landscape series of sculptures is just magical – playful, ever inventive, wonderfully contemporary, beautifully resolved in concept and manufacture, in their use and bending of geometric shapes, the sculptures really are fantastic when seen ‘in situ’ as a whole. Visit the exhibition just to see this work – buy some pieces and make your own elemental landscape!

    Dr Marcus Bunyan

     

    Peter Cole (Australian, b. 1947) 'Elements + Memories' installation views at John Buckley Gallery, Melbourne

     

    Peter Cole (Australian, b. 1947)
    Elements + Memories installation views at John Buckley Gallery, Melbourne (first and second image)
    Bar 4 – Shibuya 2009 (third image)
    Garden – Yoyogi 2009 (fourth image)

     

    In Peter D Cole’s stunning and ambitious exhibition Elements + Memories he creates a playful interactive work titled Elemental Landscape. Utilising his highly stylised modernist and reductionist technique – influenced at an early age by studies of Miro and Calder – Cole presents 64 small sculptural pieces of varying colour and shape of which the audience is encouraged to create their own compositions. Cole also presents three large-scale sculptures drawing on memories of his times in Japan.

    Cole’s distinct skill of distilling the landscape and architecture into separate elements and symbols is in itself evocative of traditional minimal Japanese aesthetic and he has created a series of works which draw upon Japanese interiors and streetscapes and the gardens of the Sakura Matsuri (Cherry Blossom festival).

    Text from John Buckley Gallery website [Online] Cited 01/04/2009. No longer available online

     

    Peter Cole. 'Elemental Landscape' 2009

    Peter Cole (Australian, b. 1947) 'Elemental Landscape' 2009

    Peter Cole (Australian, b. 1947) 'Elemental Landscape' 2009

    Peter Cole (Australian, b. 1947) 'Elemental Landscape' 2009

     

    Peter Cole (Australian, b. 1947)
    Elemental Landscape
    2009

     

     

    John Buckley Gallery

    This gallery has closed.

    LIKE ART BLART ON FACEBOOK

    Back to top

    Opening 2: ‘Colour, Time’ by David Thomas at Nellie Castan Gallery, Melbourne

    Exhibition dates: 2nd April – 2nd May, 2009

    Opening: Thursday 2nd April 2009

     

    Opening night crowd at 'Colour, Time' by David Thomas at Nellie Castan Gallery, Melbourne, 2nd April, 2009

     

    Opening night crowd at Colour, Time by David Thomas with from right to left Farbenfreude Series: Movement of Colour, Heart (Large) 2008; Farbenfreude Series: Amid Dark and Light (Dark Painting) 2008; and Farbenfreude Series: A Gentle Pasing (Large) 2008 on back wall
    Photo: Marcus Bunyan

     

     

    “A photographed real space and an expanding undefinable painting space (the non-figurative form) confront each other. The result is a coexistence of various models of space, a coexistence and entanglement of inconsistent things.”


    Christoph Dahlhausen. David Thomas EIKON nr 53, Vienna, Austria, 2006

     

     

    A slow burn painting, photography and composites show at Nellie Castan Gallery. Minimalist grid paintings combine with squares of colour taken out of photographs (again! as at the recent Richard Grigg show at Block Projects). This supposedly imparts profundity to insubstantial and mundane photographs that aim to comment on the existential nature of our being through the presence / absence of the missing spatio-temporal slice. This exhibition just didn’t hit the spot for me. Nice to catch up with Jason Smith Director of Heide Museum of Modern Art who was in attendance.

    Dr Marcus Bunyan


    Many thankx to Nellie Castan Gallery for allowing me to publish the photographs in the posting. Please click on the photographs for a larger version of the image.

     

     

    Opening night crowd at 'Colour, Time' by David Thomas at Nellie Castan Gallery, Melbourne, 2nd April, 2009

     

    Opening night crowd at Colour, Time by David Thomas with the series Length of Time 2009 on table
    Photo: Marcus Bunyan

     

    David Thomas (Australian born Northern Ireland, b. 1951) 'Length of Time Series: Blue tape on red monochrome' 2009

     

    David Thomas (Australian born Northern Ireland, b. 1951)
    Length of Time Series: Blue tape on red monochrome
    2009
    Photo: Marcus Bunyan

     

    David Thomas (Australian born Northern Ireland, b. 1951) 'End of Summer: Homage a Tati (small splash) 2009

     

    David Thomas (Australian born Northern Ireland, b. 1951)
    End of Summer: Homage a Tati (small splash)
    Enamel on photograph
    2009

     

    Opening night crowd in front of David Thomas' 'Black Reflection Painting: For William Barak' 2009

     

    Opening night crowd in front of David Thomas’ Black Reflection Painting: For William Barak 2009
    Photo: Marcus Bunyan

     

     

    Nellie Castan Gallery

    This gallery closed in 2013.

    LIKE ART BLART ON FACEBOOK

    Back to top

    Opening 1: ‘Territories’ at Project Space/Spare Room, Melbourne

    Exhibition dates: 3rd April – 1st May, 2009

    Curator: Shane Hulbert
    Opening: Thursday 2nd April, 2009

    Group photography show with artists: Shane Hulbert (Aus), John Billan (Aus), So Hing Keung (HK), Stephanie Neoh (Aus), Darren Sylvester (Aus), Ming Tse Ching (HK), Kellyann Geurts (Aus), Andrew Guthrie (HK), Kim Lawler (Aus), Law Sum Po Jamsen (HK), and Lyndal Walker (Aus).

     

    Sculptor Fredrick White in front of Lyndal Walker's 'The Time to Hesitate is Trough, no Time to Wallow in the Mire' 2009

     

    Sculptor Fredrick White in front of Lyndal Walker’s The Time to Hesitate is Through, no Time to Wallow in the Mire 2009

     

     

    Great to catch up again with John Billan, Shane Hulbert and Les Walkling!

    Marcus


    Please click on the photographs for a larger version of the image.

     

     

    Lyndal Walker (Australian, b. 1973) 'The Time to Hesitate is Through, no Time to Wallow in the Mire' 2009 from the exhibition 'Territories' at Project Space/Spare Room, Melbourne, April - May, 2009

     

    Lyndal Walker (Australian, b. 1973)
    The Time to Hesitate is Through, no Time to Wallow in the Mire
    2009

     

    “The images in this show all reflect on an exploration of intersecting territories within Australia and the Chinese Special Administration Region [SAR] of Hong Kong. Central to this exploration are the cultural linkages between claimed and reclaimed territories, social territories and psychological territories and the way this in turn influences national identity. The claim is that these things of importance, and the way we respond to the notion of territory, have recurring similarities between different cultures.

    Despite the broadness of the title, the notion of territories is becoming increasingly relevant in a global community, as the traditional borderlines and barriers that define who we are and what we stand for as a culture change in response to internal and external shifts.”

    Shane Hulbert 2009

     

    'Territories' opening night crowd at Project Space/Spare Room, Melbourne

     

    Territories opening night crowd at Project Space/Spare Room, Melbourne

     

    Ming Tse Chong (Chinese, b. 1960) 'City Still Life II' 2008 from the exhibition 'Territories' at Project Space/Spare Room, Melbourne, April - May, 2009

     

    Ming Tse Chong (Chinese, b. 1960)
    City Still Life II
    2008

     

     

    Project Space/Spare Room

    PROJECT SPACE and SPARE ROOM closed in March 2022

    LIKE ART BLART ON FACEBOOK

    Back to top

    Review: ‘reENLIGHTENMENT’ exhibition by Peter James Smith at Gallery 101, Melbourne

    Exhibition dates: 18th March – 4th April, 2009

     

    Peter James Smith. 'reENLIGHTENMENT' installation view 2009

    Peter James Smith. 'reENLIGHTENMENT' installation view 2009

     

    Peter James Smith (New Zealand, b. 1954)
    reENLIGHTENMENT installation views
    2009

     

     

    “Every passion borders on the chaotic, but the collector’s passion borders on the chaos of memories. More than that: the chance, the fate, that suffuse the past before my eyes are conspicuously present in the accustomed confusion of these books. For what else is this collection but a disorder to which habit has accommodated itself to such an extent that it can appear as order?”1

     

    “Thus the claim is that texts themselves can actually be intrinsically ‘genuine’, but that authenticity is a ‘social construct’. In other words, a certain kind of authenticity is created through the interaction of the users, situations and the texts.”2

     

     

    Peter James Smith links the culture of science and of human experience, bringing together mathematics and the power of nature in realist imagery that is balanced by strong mark making and text. Redolent still life and landscape images juxtapose with astronomical, poetic and historical observations in the painted images. Handwritten citations, notes, jottings, diagrams and erasures float on the loosely painted surfaces of stretched linen, paper collage and found pieces which bring a Beuysian sense of the charismatic object. A sunset, a violin, a book of verse, an installation of old bells or delicate Jasperware porcelain provide a resonant foil for the artist and viewer – and create a space for the imagination, for mathematical wonder and contemplation.

    “Beyond painting, in the current work there is a sense of history allowing us to privilege its objects, their collecting and their housing on walls, in vitrines, on shelves and on plinths. Like any true collector I am keen to bring them to an audience, to show them in a revelatory way. If they are inflected by hand markings it is to personalise the revelation. There are no plastic imitations: the Jasperware vases are authentic collected Wedgwood; the small Greek Pelike is indeed a c 300 BC vase; the Roman glass is a c 300 AD; the collected Wollemi pine needles are indeed from this prehistoric plant. These and other antiquities have a long museological tradition. The narratives of Wedgwood blue and white Jasperware designs are of Greek antiquity – the firing of the white clay over a cobalt blue base (in around) 1772 was a triumph of chemistry over alchemy. With these objects, it is not a postmodernist kitsch that is revealed, but rather the resuscitated fabric of authenticity. I am re-enlightened by their tactile physical presence that has a timeless beauty. To render such things as a painted image is to engage in a different act, with different rules referring to different histories.”

    Peter James Smith, 2009. Notes from the exhibition catalogue.

     
    Enlightenment, Romanticism, reason, authenticity, revelation.

    I am a collector like Peter James Smith. I display my collection of early 20th century English vases. I have a collection of 300 ties that span from the 1930s to the 1970s. I have eight rare 1940s suits, those suits that Humphrey Bogart used to wear with the wide wide lapels that nearly reach the seam of the sleeve.

    Rare, fragile, beautiful, genuine.

    In this exhibition Smith appeals not to the genuineness of the objects but to the authenticity of the objects he displays: “There are no plastic imitations … With these objects, it is not a postmodernist kitsch that is revealed, but rather the resuscitated fabric of authenticity.” He wants to show these objects in a revelatory way, for us to once more appreciate their authenticity. To make order out of disorder. But then Smith wants to personalise this revelation and overlays the objects with texts that re-order the taxonomy through a reinscription that is both a de-territorialization and re-territorialization of meaning, a loss of original meaning and the production of new meanings. This is the faint silver flicker of re-enlightenment the artist seeks. It is above all authentication as individual spectacle, as social construct.

    “Authenticity is an issue for us today because of a widespread sense that there is something inauthentic in the way we experience the modern world.”3

    In some of the works this process is effective and in other works it falls flat on it’s proverbial, intertextual backside. The process works well in the less cerebral works. The use of black paint in Paradise Lost IV (below) is particularly effective as the re-inscription of paint invades and threatens the motifs of the classical figures with the text and cross reinforcing the idea of a lost paradise. Cathedral (2009, below) is also a stunning installation of different bells hung at various heights within a locked cabinet, complicit in their silence as they would not be inside a cathedral. For me this was probably the best piece in the show for its simplicity of thought, eloquence of execution and understanding of how the installation re-enlightens the viewers socially constructed authenticity in a revelatory way. No double marking is needed – a zen balance is proposed and achieved in the quietness of the viewers mind.

    Other pieces are less successful. Amphora in grey teracotta Han Dynasty c 100BC (2008), the amphora inscribed with text sitting on a painted black video recorder is particularly unengaging and unappealing – there is no revelatory experience to be had here. The Greek Pileke (see below) inscribed with lines from John Keats Ode on a Grecian Urn seems an appropriate intervention but sometimes in this exhibition one just longs to appreciate the sanctity of the object, it’s presence, in silence without the personalising of the revelation by the hand of the artist. To see the object clearly for what it is.

    The large installation reELIGHTENMENT (2009 below, and installation photo at top) falls into darkness. The use of the doors as metaphor is clumsy, book covers have been more successfully used by other artists and the black paint is heavy and oppressive. More interesting are some of the paintings, for example The slow dance of an astronomical twighlight (2009, below) where the poem of William Wordsworth

    … a sense sublime
    Of something far more deeply interfused,
    Whose dwelling is the light of setting suns

    illuminates the poetry of the painting, adding an insightful double meaning to the universal revelation. A vibration of spirit is present both in the landscape and the markings upon the landscape. Unfortunately all too often in this exhibition access to the sublime is denied. Appeals to neo-authenticity fall on deaf ears. The motifs of this exhibition are universal, archetypal but the elements that go to make up this exhibition are too many and lack focus. Sometimes in art less in more and this exhibition is a classic example of this fact. There are some interesting elements but overall the whole is not the sum of its parts.

    As John Donne observed

    “All mankind is of one author, and is one volume; when one man dies, one chapter is not torn out of the book, but translated into a better language; and every chapter must be so translated … No man is an island, entire of itself; every man is a piece of the continent, a part of the main.”4

    Our authentic place in the world, our spiritual space, our re-enlightenment needed to be better defined, more lucidly enunciated in this exhibition NOT IN CAPITAL LETTERS but in the quietness of our hearts.

    Dr Marcus Bunyan

     

    1/ Benjamin, Walter. “Unpacking my Library: A Talk about Book Collecting,” in Illuminations. English translation. London: Fontana, 1982, pp. 59-60

    2/ Lee, W. “Authenticity revisited: text authenticity and learner authenticity,” in ELT Journal, 49(4). 1995, pp. 323-328 cited in Shomoossi, Nematullah and Ketabi, Saeed. “A Critical Look at the Concept of Authenticity,” in Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 2007, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 149-155 [Online] cited on 29th March, 2009 at http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/v4n12007/shomoossi.pdf

    3/ McClure, Christoper. The Concept of Authenticity in Charles Taylor and Martin Heidegger. [Online] cited on March 29th, 2009 (no longer available online)

    4/ Donne, John. Devotions Upon Emergent Occasions, Meditation XVII: Nunc Lento Sonitu Dicunt, Morieris. 1624.

     

    Variously

    Wedgwood Jasperware, Roman glass, Greek Pileke, books, doors, texts, paintings, bells, video, video machine, wooden boxes, black paint, crosses, albatross, Wollemi Pine needles, Paradise Lost, astronomy, linen, stars, photography, Chinese porcelain, collage, mathematical equations, mirrors, Amphora from the Han Dynasty, a violin, a sunset, a book of verse, notes, shelves, jottings, citations.

    Notes to myself

    ~ Golden ratio
    ~ The archive
    ~ Topographical markings, inscriptions and decodings
    ~ The ‘nature’ of authenticity
    ~ The ‘voice’ of revelation
    ~ Re-possession of clarity and logic
    ~ Re-production of mystery, tenderness and love
    ~ Reverence for the object itself
    ~ Referentiality between image and text
    ~ The colour black: transcendent, the depths of the night sky but also the closing in of darkness at the end of days
    ~ Never one truth but many truths
    ~ Less is more


    Many thankx to Gallery 101 for allowing me to publish the photographs in the posting. Please click on the photographs for a larger version of the image.

     

     

    Peter James Smith (New Zealand, b. 1954) 'The slow dance of an astronomical twighlight' 2009 from the exhibition 'reENLIGHTENMENT' exhibition by Peter James Smith at Gallery 101, Melbourne, March - April, 2009

     

    Peter James Smith (New Zealand, b. 1954)
    The slow dance of an astronomical twighlight
    2009

     

    Peter James Smith (New Zealand, b. 1954) 'Paradise Lost IV' 2008 from the exhibition 'reENLIGHTENMENT' exhibition by Peter James Smith at Gallery 101, Melbourne, March - April, 2009

     

    Peter James Smith (New Zealand, b. 1954)
    Paradise Lost IV
    2008

     

    Peter James Smith (New Zealand, b. 1954) 'Ode on a Grecian Urn' 2008

     

    Peter James Smith (New Zealand, b. 1954)
    Ode on a Grecian Urn
    2008

     

    Peter James Smith (New Zealand, b. 1954) 'Cathedral' 2009

     

    Peter James Smith (New Zealand, b. 1954)
    Cathedral
    2009

     

    Peter James Smith (New Zealand, b. 1954) 'reENLIGHTENMENT' 2009

     

    Peter James Smith (New Zealand, b. 1954)
    reENLIGHTENMENT
    2009

     

     

    Gallery 101

    This gallery is now closed.

    LIKE ART BLART ON FACEBOOK

    Back to top

    Review: ‘The Big Black Bubble’ exhibition by Dale Frank at Anna Schwartz Gallery, Melbourne

    Exhibition dates: 12th March – 11th April, 2009

     

    Dale Frank (Australian, b. 1959) 'The Big Black Bubble' installation view at Anna Schwartz Gallery, Melbourne 2009

     

    Dale Frank (Australian, b. 1959)
    The Big Black Bubble (installation view)
    Left to right: Timothy Oliphant (2008), Ryan Gosling (2008/2009) and Matthew Macfadyen (2008)
    2009

     

     

    This is a brilliant exhibition by Dale Frank, one of my favourites so far this year in Melbourne.

    Six large varnish on linen landscape paintings are presented in the beautiful Anna Schwartz gallery space in Melbourne. Photographs really do not do the paintings justice – they can only give an impression of the size and scale of the work but not of their intimacy or smell. The smell of varnish permeates the air. The serendipity of the natural convulsions of the varnish and the facilitations of the hand of the artist, his performance, have been caught like bugs in amber in the final molecular structure of the painting. Here are pendulous, globular goops of varnish, immersive heroic tone poems that form images in the mind of the viewer. Moving close to the paintings you are surrounded by flows and eddies, the macro and the micro; details become more apparent as you study the work.

    While disagreeing that these paintings are the viewers to create (the viewer as author) what I can say is that the artist offers the viewer the ability to generate their own resonances with the painting, to use the imagination of ‘equivalence’ to suggest what these paintings stand for – and also what else they stand for. States of being, of transformation, wonder and joy emerge in the playfulness of these works. Perhaps this is where the titles of the paintings come from, referencing film actors in the pop tradition, but this is the only thing that did not ring true with the work, their titles. The use of this trope seems to me a bit facile given the nature of the work.

    The hot pink painting Rupert Grint (2008/2009, above) is hotter and lighter than in the photograph below, the varnish more translucent, the effect altogether mesmeric. You are drawn into the work, the intensity of the colour, the thickness of the hanging varnish. Two cosmological galaxies (Timothy Oliphant (2008) and Matthew Macfadyen (2008)) surround the most complex painting in the exhibition, the darkness and light that is Ryan Gosling (2008/2009, below).

    This painting is a tour de force. With the poetic structure of an oil spill, the varnish forms intricate slick upon slick contours that are almost topographical in their mapping. The black oozes light, becomes ‘plastic’ black before your eyes, like the black of Rembrandt’s backgrounds, illusive, illuminative and hard to pin down – perpetually hanging there in two dripping rows, fixed but fluid at one and the same time (you can just see the suspensions in the photograph above).

    The painting reminds me of the black paintings of Mark Rothko that he undertook for The Rothko Chapel in Houston, Texas (see below). As with the Rothko paintings, this painting is not just black (physically there are swirls of purple as in the Rothko paintings), not about darkness at all. What both artists do is create a contemplative, transformative space – in Frank’s case for a world on the edge of oblivion. This is a post post-modern landscape: process and nature, performance and chance coalescing in the colour : black!

    This painting is one of the most overwhelming syntheses of art and nature, of universal forces that I have seen in recent contemporary art. This exhibition is an electric pulsating universe of life, landscape and transformation. Magnificent!

    Dr Marcus Bunyan


    Many thankx to Anna Schwartz Gallery for allowing me to publish the photographs in the posting. Please click on the photographs for a larger version of the image.

     

     

    Dale Frank (Australian, b. 1959) 'The Big Black Bubble' installation view at Anna Schwartz Gallery, Melbourne 2009

     

    Dale Frank (Australian, b. 1959)
    The Big Black Bubble (installation view)
    Left to right: Daniel Radcliffe (2008/2009), Khan Chittenden (2009) and Rupert Grint (2008/2009)
    2009

     

    The immersive scale of these new paintings at Anna Schwartz Gallery Melbourne allows us to experience their inner qualities of landscape and of transformation. This is painting at fundamental authenticity. The paint is its own agent; it is allowed to act, to behave. The artist is the facilitator of these phenomena of nature and natural forces, whose residue is a metaphor for nature itself.

    Black contains all colours, contours and depths. A pink monochrome is transformed by pure varnish into an expressionistic moment of process and performance. All colour is absent from elemental silver aluminium and form and gesture alone survive. New dynamics are possible through an innovative colouration: the emergence of colour through black, and its equivalent power.

    Dale Frank’s painting is one of poetry, performance and nature. It represents both the macro and micro. Huge universal forces pulsate with molecular, atomic activities. Imagination is gifted by the artist to the viewer. These are our paintings to create.

    Anonymous text from the exhibition flyer.

     

    Dale Frank (Australian, b. 1959) 'Ryan Gosling' 2008/2009

     

    Dale Frank (Australian, b. 1959)
    Ryan Gosling
    2008/2009

     

    The Rothko Chapel, Houston, Texas

     

    The Rothko Chapel
    Houston, Texas

     

     

    Anna Schwartz Gallery
    185 Flinders Lane
    Melbourne 3000
    Australia
    Phone: +61 3 9654 6131

    Opening hours:
    Tuesday – Friday 12 – 5pm
    Saturday 1 – 5pm

    Anna Schwartz Gallery website

    LIKE ART BLART ON FACEBOOK

    Back to top

    Photograph: The Passing of Memory: resurrecting a photograph for the series ‘The Shape of Dreams’

    March 2009

     

    Marcus Bunyan (Australian born England, b. 1958) 'Oakland, 7-'51' from the series 'The Shape of Dreams' 2009

     

    Marcus Bunyan (Australian born England, b. 1958)
    Oakland, 7-’51 from the series The Shape of Dreams (restored)
    2009

     

     

    “Fragments of harmonic lines assemble and collapse as the meaning of each interval must be continually revised in light of the unfolding precession of further terms in an ultimately unsustainable syntax. The mind’s ear tries to remember the sum of passing intervals, but without the ability to incorporate them into larger identifiable units each note inevitably lapses back into silence, surrendered to the presence of the currently sounding tone, itself soon to give way to another newly isolated note in its turn.”


    Craig Dworkin1

     

     

    The Passing of Memory

    Thinking about this photograph

    I bought an album on Ebay that contained an anonymous aviator with snapshots of his life: photographs of him in Oakland, California, Cologne in Germany and flying out of Italy – photos of his buddies and the work they did, the places they visited, the fun they had.

    This one photograph has haunted me more than the rest.

    Who was he? What was his life like? Do he get married and have children? Is he still alive?

    When scanned the image was so dirty, so degraded, that I spent 7 weeks of my life cleaning and restoring the photograph working all hours of the day and night. I was obsessive almost to the point of obstinacy. Many times I nearly gave up as I thought the task impossible – thousands of dots and hairs inhabited the surface of the image and, surely, it was just another photograph one of millions that circle the world. Why expend so much energy just to resurrect this one particular image?

    Some things that can be said about this photograph

    It is small measuring only 9cm high by 7.5 cm wide

    It is printed on cheap glossy photographic paper which now has a slight yellow tinge to it.

    The image is creased at top left.

    The back is annotated ‘Oakland, 7-’51’

    The dark roundel with the wing on the side of the aircraft has faint text that spells out the words ‘AERO ACE’.

    There is no engine in the aircraft and it looks from the parts lying on the ground that the aircraft is being broken up or used for spares.

    The man is wearing work overalls with unidentifiable insignia on them, a worker on the aircraft being dismantled or just a fitter on the base.

    Someone standing on the ground has obviously called out the man’s name and he has turned around in response to the call and lent forward and put out his hand in greeting – a beautiful spontaneous response – and the photograph has been taken.

    Some other things that can be said about this photograph, in passing

    The sun splashes the man’s face. He smiles at the camera.

    His arm rests gently on the metal of the aircraft, shielded from the sun.

    Perhaps he wears a ring on his fifth finger.

    He is blind.

    This photograph is an individual, isolated note in the fabric of time. It could easily pass into silence as memory and image fade from view. Memories of the individual form the basis for remembering and photographs act as an aide-memoire both for individual memory and the collective memory that flows from individual memory. Memory is always and only partial and fragmentary – who is remembering, what are they remembering, when do they remember, what prompts them to remember and how these memories are incorporated into the collective memory, an always mediated phenomenon that manifests itself in the actions and statements of individuals, are important questions.

    Images are able to trigger memories and emotional responses to a particular time and place, but since this photograph has no personal significance what is going on here? Why did I cry when I was restoring it? What emotional association was happening inside me?

    “To remember is always to give a reading of the past, a reading which requires linguistic skills derived from the traditions of explanation and story-telling within a culture and which [presents] issues in a narrative that owes its meaning ultimately to the interpretative practices of a community of speakers. This is true even when what is remembered is one’s own past experience… [The] mental image of the past … becomes a phenomenon of consciousness only when clothed with words, and these owe their meaning to social practices of communication.”2


    His blindness stares at us while underneath his body walks away into his passing.

    I have become the speaker for this man, for this image.

    His brilliant face is our brilliant face.

    In this speaking, the phenomenon of making the image conscious, the gap between image and presence, between the photo and its shadow has collapsed. There is no past and present but a collective resonance that has presence in images.

    “Such reasoning questions the separation of past and present in a fundamental way. As a consequence it becomes fruitless to discuss whether or not a particular event or process remembered corresponds to the actual past: all that matters are the specific conditions under which such memory is constructed as well as the personal and social implications of memories held.”3

    ‘The personal and social implications of memories held’. Or not held, if images are lost in passing.

    It is such a joyous image, the uplifted hand almost in supplication. I feel strong connection to this man. I bring his presence into consciousness in my life, and by my thinking into the collective memory. Perhaps the emotional response is that as I get older photographs of youth remind me of the passing of time more strongly. Perhaps the image reminds me of the smiling father I never had. These are not projections of my own feelings but resonances held in the collective memory.

    As Susan Sontag has observed,

    “Remembering is an ethical act, has ethical value in and of itself. Memory is, achingly, the only relation we can have with the dead. So the belief that remembering is an ethical act is deep in our natures as humans, who know we are going to die, and who mourn those who in the normal course of things die before us – grandparents, parents, teachers and older friends.”4


    Remembering is an ethical act. It is also a voluntary act. We can choose not to remember. We can choose to forget. In this photograph I choose to remember, to not let pass into the dark night of the soul. My mind, eyes and heart are open.

    This is not a simulacra of an original image but an adaptation, an adaptation that tries to find resonances between past and present, between image and shadow. As such this photograph is no longer an isolated tone that inevitably lapses back into silence but part of a bracketing of time that is convulsingly beautiful in it’s illumination, it’s presence. The individual as collective, collected memory present for all to see.

    The form of formlessness, the shape of dreams.

    Dr Marcus Bunyan

     

    1/ Dworkin, Craig. “Grammar Degree Zero (Introduction to Re-Writing Freud)” (2005) [Online] Cited 23rd March, 2009 (no longer available online)

    2/ Holtorf, Cornelius. “Social Memory,” part of a doctoral thesis Monumental Past: The Life-histories of Megalithic Monuments in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (Germany) submitted 1998 [Online] Cited 23/03/2009

    3/ Ibid.,

    4/ Sontag, Susan. Regarding the Pain of Others. London: Hamish Hamilton, 2003, p. 103

       

       

      Marcus Bunyan (Australian born England, b. 1958) 'Oakland, 7-'51' from the series 'The Shape of Dreams' 2009 (detail before cleaning)

      Before

       

      Marcus Bunyan (Australian born England, b. 1958) 'Oakland, 7-'51' from the series 'The Shape of Dreams' 2009 (detail after cleaning)

      After

       

      Marcus Bunyan (Australian born England, b. 1958) 'Oakland, 7-'51' from the series 'The Shape of Dreams' 2009 (detail before cleaning)

      Before

       

      Marcus Bunyan (Australian born England, b. 1958) 'Oakland, 7-'51' from the series 'The Shape of Dreams' 2009 (detail after cleaning)

      After

       

      Marcus Bunyan (Australian born England, b. 1958) 'Oakland, 7-'51' from the series 'The Shape of Dreams' 2009 (detail before cleaning)

      Before

       

      Marcus Bunyan (Australian born England, b. 1958) 'Oakland, 7-'51' from the series 'The Shape of Dreams' 2009 (detail after cleaning)

      After

       

      Marcus Bunyan (Australian born England, b. 1958) 'Oakland, 7-'51' from the series 'The Shape of Dreams' 2009 (detail before cleaning)

      Before

       

      Marcus Bunyan (Australian born England, b. 1958) 'Oakland, 7-'51' from the series 'The Shape of Dreams' 2009 (detail after cleaning)

      After

       

      Marcus Bunyan (Australian born England, b. 1958) 'Oakland, 7-'51' from the series 'The Shape of Dreams' 2009 (detail before cleaning)

      Before

       

      Marcus Bunyan. 'Oakland, 7-'51' from the series 'The Shape of Dreams' 2009

      After

       

       

      LIKE ART BLART ON FACEBOOK

      Back to top

      Review: ‘Order and disorder: archives and photography’ at the National Gallery of Victoria International, Melbourne

      Exhibition dates: 18th October, 2008 – 19th April, 2009

       

      Patrick Pound (New Zealander, b. 1962, worked in Australia 1989- ) 'Writing in a library' 1996 from the exhibition 'Order and disorder: archives and photography' at the National Gallery of Victoria International, Melbourne, October, 2008 - April, 2009

       

      Patrick Pound (New Zealander, b. 1962, worked in Australia 1989- )
      Writing in a library
      1996
      Photocopies, oil stick, card
      169.4 x 127.2cm (image); 180.2 x 137.2cm (sheet)
      National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
      Purchased, 1997
      © Patrick Pound  

       

       

      “These fragments I have shored against my ruins.”


      T.S. Eliot

       

       

      An interesting exhibition is presented in the [now closed] permanent third floor photography gallery at NGV International, Melbourne on a subject that deserved a much more rigorous investigation than could been undertaken in this small gallery space. Presenting single works by Ed Ruscha, Bernd and Hilla Becher, Patrick Pound, Robert Rooney, Simon Obarzanek, Penelope Davis, Candid Hofer, Linda Judge and Charles Green and Lyndell Brown the works seek to investigate the nature of the relationship between photography and the archive, between the semi-permanences of an archival memory and the spaces of a transgressive intertexuality marked by fragmentary, ironic counter-performances.

      As noted in the catalogue essay by NGV curator Maggie Finch the archive is a place for holding knowledge that contains elements of truth and error, order and disorder; archives are able to shape history and memory, depending on how, when and by whom the records are accessed. Any disruption of order, governance and authority can lead to alternative readings and interpretations as the arcane ‘mysteries’ of the methods of classification are overturned. Since Victorian times when the body came under the self-surveillance of the camera and was found wanting, photographs have documented the faces of criminals, the physiognomy of degeneration and the fever of war.

      As Yiannis Papatheodorou has observed when reviewing Jacques Derrida Mal d’Archive,

      “Derrida declares that since the dominant power of the archive derives from the economy of knowledge, it also provides the institutional responsibility of the interpretation. The localisation of the information transforms the inscription, provided by the function of the archive, into the impression of a memory’s trace, conscious or unconscious …

      The preservation of memory, the access to information, the “resources” of the sources and the working environment are not just the representation of a future memory. They are active practices and discourses that create hierarchies and exclusions. The archives are the languages of the past, activated however dialogically, according to scientific and social demands. The content of our choice is marked by the way we are seeking information. Far from being an abstract principle, our choice is an ideologically oriented negotiation closely related to the politics of interpretation.”1


      And there’s the rub. Not only is this exhibition a reordering of an unpublished memory (for that is what an archive is, a unique unpublished memory), it is also a reiteration of the authority of the gallery itself, the “institutional responsibility of the interpretation.”2 Deciding what was in this exhibition and what to leave out creates hierarchies of inclusion and exclusion – and in this case the inclusions are mainly ‘safe’ works, ones that challenge the ontology of existence, the cataloguing of reality in a slightly ironic way but oh – nothing too shocking! nothing too disordered! Nothing here then of the archive of images that substantiate the horrors of war, the trans/disfiguration of men in both World Wars for example. There are few images to haunt us, none to refresh our memories in a problematic way.

      The more successful pieces, the works that challenge the order of the archive (“what is no longer archived in the same way is no longer lived in the same way”)3, are the ones by Ed Ruscha, Penelope Davis and Simon Obarzaneck (all below).

      Ruscha’s vertical inverted cityscape is trapped in a display cabinet opened out on the horizontal plane in concertina format, like one of those optical illusion images in which you see an image looking from one direction and a different image from the other direction. Ruscha’s personal experience of driving down Sunset Strip in Los Angeles and his anthropological recording of the urban experience has been disseminated in a mass produced ‘artists’ book. No unique unpublished archive here. Beneath the facades of the shops other narratives emerge – images are stitched together, cars chopped off, people dismembered – all in a very linear, conceptual way; a journey from one point to another, one that is both subjective (the voice  and hand of the author) and objective (the en masse production of the book).

      As Chris Balaschak has noted, “The images, taken during the day, capture only the facades of the buildings. Ignorance is given to cars or people, both of which are often cut in half between separate exposures. The imperfections of matching the facades are cracks along Ruscha’s drive. Through these cracks we find Ruscha, not such an anonymous author after all. Splitting cars in two, and mismatching facades we become keenly aware of the passage of time. The facades of buildings may appear as stage sets but they are active points on other itineraries, anticipating future and past narratives.”4


      This is Ruscha’s trace through the city but also our intersection with his journey, our chance to make our own itineraries as Balaschak (in his insightful writing) rightly points out. The fragmentary dismembering becomes the space between, the disorder of the linear into a heterotopic space of remembering. We the viewer create our own narrative, flitting through the cracks in the archive of memory, the photographer, the author of our own journey.

      Penelope Davis photograms are luminous objects. She makes resin casts of the spine of discarded books and places the casts directly onto photographic paper and then exposes them to light. The books glow and hover in the blackness, the words on the spine reversed. Stripped of their context, of their memory, they become ethereal books, phantom texts, liminal images that hover between what is known and what is imagined. As Davis has said, “Most people assume that when they look at a photo that they are looking at the thing photographed – but they are not. They are looking at a photo. Books and photographic images and archives are enigmatic – you can’t be sure of a singular definition or meaning.”

      Davis is ‘messing around’ with the idea of veracity, the truth of photography and the ordering of the archive of our mind through the images we collate. We seek to grasp the original memory of an event, of the reading and ordering of our life through images and none is available to us, for as Foucault has observed memories are only ever fragmentary and distorted representations, partial truths a best. Like Jorge Luis Borges’ journey into the infinite universe of The Library of Babel, for Foucault the psyche is not an archive but a mirror, like the shining silver foil surface of the cover of the Ed Ruscha book:

      “The search for the self is a journey into a mental labyrinth that takes random courses and ultimately ends at impasses. The memory fragments recovered along the way cannot provide us with a basis for interpreting the overall meaning of the journey. The meanings that we derive from our memories are only partial truths, and their value is ephemeral. For Foucault, the psyche is not an archive but only a mirror. To search the psyche for the truth about ourselves is a futile task because the psyche can only reflect the images we have conjured up to describe ourselves. Looking into the psyche, therefore, is like looking into the mirror image of a mirror. One sees oneself reflected in an image of infinite regress. Our gaze is led not toward the substance of our beginnings but rather into the meaninglessness of previously discarded images of the self.”5


      This leads us nicely onto the images of Simon Obarzanek.

      In a fantastic series of photographs, the only ones of this exhibition that seemed to haunt me (as Susan Sontag says images do), Obarzanek photographs people in an ordered, almost scientific, manner. Photographed face on against a non-contextual background using a low depth of field, these repetitive, collective, unnamed people remind me of the images of Galton. But here the uniformity is overwhelmed by quirky differences – the placement of eyes and lips seem large offering a strange, surreal physiognomy. These images resonate, the challenge, they remain with you, they question the order of things as no other photograph in this exhibition does. From simplicity comes eloquence.

      To finish I must address the elephant in the room, in fact two elephants!

      There is not one digital photograph contained in the exhibition, the work being collage, Type C colour or black and white silver gelatin prints. There is no mention in the catalogue of the crisis of cultural memory that is now permeating our world. Some believe the ever expanding digital archive, the Internet, threatens our lived memories “amidst the process of the ‘digitisation of culture’ and the new possibilities of storing.”6 This vision entails the fear of loosing cultural contents, hitting the delete button so that  memory passes into forgetting. This is a vision to which I do not subscribe, but the issue needed to be addressed in this exhibition: how are digital technologies altering our re-assemblance of memory, altering photography’s ability inherent ability to record, store and organise visual images? What about the aura of the original or was there never such a thing?

      Furthermore, it would seem that with photographs becoming less and less a fixed essence; with the meaning of the photograph more and more divorced from its referent; with the spectators look the key to reading photographs; and the performance of the photograph a cut and paste reality… then perhaps we are left not with the two polar opposites of order and disorder but some orthogonal spaces in-between.

      The second elephant in the room in the gallery space itself.

      Whilst the curators of photography at the National Gallery of Victoria do an amazing job running large exhibitions such as the Andreas Gursky and Rennie Ellis shows that have starred this year, the NGV ‘International’ is shooting itself in the foot with the current permanent photography gallery space. Small, jaded and dour it seems an addendum to other larger spaces in the gallery and to be honest photography and Melbourne deserves better. Personally I feel more alive in the fashion gallery that is on the floor below and that, for an photographer, is a hard thing to say.

      As the theme for this exhibition deserved a greater in depth investigation so the gallery needs to expand it’s horizons and give the permanent photography gallery a redesign and overhaul. Where is the life and passion of contemporary photography displayed in a small space for all to see in a gallery that sees itself as ‘International’? In an occularcentric world the key word is intertexuality: the gallery space should reflect the electri-city, the mixing of a gallery design ethos with images to surround us in a space that makes us passionate about contemporary photography. Now that would really be a new order of things!

      Dr Marcus Bunyan

       

      1/ Papatheodorou, Yiannis. History in the promised land of memory. Review of  Jacques Derrida, Mal d’Archive, Paris, Éd. Galilée, 1995 [Online] Cited on 20th March 2009 (no longer available online)

      2/ “The archive is understood as collective reservoir of knowledge fulfilling diverse functions and conditioned by three main factors: conservation, selection and accessibility. How are contents stored and which media are used to conserve them? What is selected for storage and what is decided to be cleared out and thus forgotten? Who decides what is archived and who has access to the resources? All these questions paint the archive as a political space where relations of power cross aspects of culture and collective identity.”
      Assmann, A. (2003) Erinnerungsräume, Formen und Wandlungen des kulturellen Gedächtnis. [Memory Spaces, Forms and Transformations of Cultural Memory] Special paperback editon, 1st edition publ. 1999, München: Beck, p. 343-346

      3/ Derrida, Jacques. (1996) Archive Fever, A Freudian Impression. Transl. by E. Prenowitz, p. 18 orig. publ. as Mal d’Archive: une impression freudienne in 1995, Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press

      4/ Balaschak, Chris. Itineraries [part 3] [Online] Cited on 20th March 2009 (no longer available online)

      5/ Hutton, Patrick. “Foucault, Freud, and the Technologies of the Self,” in Martin, Luther and Gutman, Huck and Hutton, Patrick (eds.,). Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. London: Tavistock Publications, 1988, p. 139

      6/ Featherstone, M. (2000) “Archiving Cultures,” in British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), pp. 161-184


      Many thankx to the National Gallery of Victoria for allowing me to publish the images in the posting. Please click on the photographs for a larger version of the image.

       

       

      Ed Ruscha (American, b. 1937) 'Every Building on Sunset Strip' 1966 from the exhibition 'Order and disorder: archives and photography' at the National Gallery of Victoria International, Melbourne, October, 2008 - April, 2009

      Ed Ruscha (American, b. 1937) 'Every Building on Sunset Strip' 1966 from the exhibition 'Order and disorder: archives and photography' at the National Gallery of Victoria International, Melbourne, October, 2008 - April, 2009

      Ed Ruscha (American, b. 1937) 'Every Building on Sunset Strip' 1966

      Ed Ruscha (American, b. 1937) 'Every Building on Sunset Strip' 1966

       

      Ed Ruscha (American, b. 1937)
      Every building on the Sunset Strip
      1966
      Artist book: photo-offset lithographs, letterpress, concertina, cardboard cover, silver-coated plastic-covered slipcase, 1st edition
      17.8 x 760.7cm (open); 17.8 x 14.4 x 0.8cm (closed); 18.6 x 14.6 x 1.4cm (slipcase)
      Private collection, Melbourne
      © Ed Ruscha, courtesy Gagosian Gallery, New York

       

      Penelope Davis (Australian, b. 1963) 'Shelf' 2008

       

      Penelope Davis (Australian, b. 1963)
      Shelf
      2008
      From the Fiction-Non-Fiction series 2007-2008
      Type C photograph
      90.0 x 70.0cm
      National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
      Purchased, Victorian Foundation for Living Australian Artists, 2008

       

      Archives contain elements of truth and error, order and disorder and are infinitely fascinating. As both collections of records and repositories of data, archives are able to shape history and memory depending on how, when and by whom the materials are accessed. Their vastness allows for multiple readings to be unravelled over time.

      Photography is naturally associated with archives because of its inherent ability to record, store and organise visual images. With this in mind, this exhibition brings together artists drawn largely from the permanent collection of the NGV who explore the idea of archives as complex, living and occasionally mysterious systems of knowledge. Several of the selected artists act as archivists, collecting and ordering their own unique bodies of photographs, while others create disorder by critiquing the ideas and systems of archives.

      Text from the NGV International website [Online] Cited 13/06/2022

       

      Simon Obarzanek (Israeli/Australian, b. 1968, worked in United States 1995-2001) '6 faces from 123 faces' 2000-2002

       

      Simon Obarzanek (Israeli/Australian, b. 1968, worked in United States 1995-2001)
      6 faces from 123 faces
      2000-2002
      Gelatin silver photographs
      (a) 33.1 x 25.4cm; (b) 33.4 x 25.4cm; (c) 33.2 x 25.3cm; (d) 33.4 x 25.4cm; (e) 33.4 x 25.4cm; (f) 33.4 x 25.4cm
      National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
      Purchased with funds arranged by Loti Smorgon for Contemporary Australian Photography, 2003
      © Simon Obarzanek

       

      Simon Obarzanek (Israeli/Australian 1968-, worked in United States 1995-2001) 'Box Hill girl' 2000-2002

       

      Simon Obarzanek (Israeli/Australian, b. 1968, worked in United States 1995-2001)
      Box Hill girl
      2000-2002
      Gelatin silver photograph
      33.4 × 25.4cm
      National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
      Purchased with funds arranged by Loti Smorgon for Contemporary Australian Photography, 2003
      © Simon Obarzanek

       

      Simon Obarzanek (Israeli/Australian 1968-, worked in United States 1995-2001) 'Boy with eyes' 2000-2002

       

      Simon Obarzanek (Israeli/Australian, b. 1968, worked in United States 1995-2001)
      Boy with eyes
      2000-2002
      Gelatin silver photograph
      33.4 × 25.4cm
      National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
      Purchased with funds arranged by Loti Smorgon for Contemporary Australian Photography, 2003
      © Simon Obarzanek

       

      Candida Höfer (German, b. 1944) 'Teylers Museum Haarlem II' 2003

       

      Candida Höfer (German, b. 1944)
      Teylers Museum Haarlem II
      2003
      Type C photograph
      150.0 x 120.0cm
      National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
      Purchased, 2004
      © Candida Höfer/VG Bild-Kunst, Bonn. Licensed by Copyright Agency, Australia

       

      Bernd and Hilla Becher (German, 1931-2007 and 1934-2015) 'Coal tipple, Goodspring, Pennsylvania' 1975

       

      Bernd and Hilla Becher (German, 1931-2007 and 1934-2015)
      Coal tipple, Goodspring, Pennsylvania
      1975
      From the Artists and photographs folio 1975
      Gelatin silver photographs
      24.0 × 33.9cm (image and sheet) 40.7 × 49.6cm (support)
      National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne
      Purchased, 1976

       

       

      NGV International
      180 St Kilda Road

      Opening hours:
      10am – 5pm daily

      National Gallery of Victoria website

      LIKE ART BLART ON FACEBOOK

      Back to top

      Opening 3: Review: ‘Show Court 3’ and ‘Mood Bomb’ by Louise Paramor at Nellie Castan Gallery, Melbourne

      Exhibition dates: 5th March – 28th March, 2009

      Opening: Thursday 5th March, 2009

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) 'Show Court 3 (II)' 2009

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      Show Court 3 (II)
      2009

       

       

      Boarding a train at Flinders Street we emerge at South Yarra station to stroll down to River Street for our third opening of the night at Nellie Castan Gallery. We are greeted by the ever gracious Nellie Castan who has just returned from an overseas trip to Europe where she was soaking up the wonders of Rome amongst other places. For the latest exhibition in the gallery Louise Paramor is presenting two bodies of work: Show Court 3 and Mood Bomb (both 2009). Lets look at Show Court 3 first as this work has older origins.

      Originally exhibited in 2006 at Nellie Castan under the title Jam Session the sculptures from this exhibition and many more beside (75 in all) were then installed in 2007 on show court 3 at Melbourne & Olympic Parks, hence the title of the installation. In the smaller gallery in 2009 we have six Lambda photographic prints that are records of this installation plus a video of the installation and de-installation of the work.

      While interesting as documentary evidence of the installation these photographs are thrice removed from the actual sculptures – the sculptures themselves, the installation of the sculptures on court and then the photographs of the installation of the sculptures. The photographs lose something in this process – the presence or link back to the referentiality of the object itself. There is no tactile suggestiveness here, no fresh visual connections to be made with the materials, no human interaction. The intertextual nature of the objects, the jamming together of found pieces of bright plastic to make seductive anthropomorphic creatures that ‘play’ off of each other has been lost.

      What has been reinforced in the photographs is a phenomena that was observed in the actual installation.

      “The sculptures created a jarring visual disruption when placed in a location normally associated with play and movement. The stadium seating surrounding the tennis court incited an expectation of entertainment; a number of viewers sat looking at the sculptures, as though waiting for them to spin and jump around. But mostly, the exhibition reversed the usual role of visitors to place where one sits and watches others move; here the objects on the tennis court were static and the spectators moved around.” (2007)1

      In the photographs of these objects and in the installation itself what occurs is an inversion of perception, a concept noted by the urbanist Paul Virilio.2 Here the objects perceive us instead of us perceiving the object: they stare back with an oculocentric ‘suggestiveness’ which is advertising’s raison d’être (note the eye sculpture above). In particular this is what the photographs suggest – a high gloss surface, an advertising image that grabs our attention and forces us to look but is no longer a powerful image.

      In the main gallery was the most interesting work of the whole night – experiments of abstraction in colour “inspired by the very substance of paint itself.” Made by pouring paint onto glass and then exhibiting the smooth reverse side, these paintings are not so much about the texture of the surface (as is Dale Frank’s work below) but a more ephemeral thing: the dreamscapes of the mind that they promote in the viewer, the imaginative connections that ask the viewer to make. Simpler and perhaps more refined than Frank’s work (because of the smooth surface, the lack of the physicality of the layering technique? because of the pooling of amoebic shapes produced, not the varnish that accumulates and recedes?) paint oozes, bleeds, swirls, drips upwards and blooms with a sensuality of intense love. They are dream states that allow the viewer to create their own narrative with the title of the works offering gentle guides along the way: Girl with Flowers, Lovers, Mood Bomb, Emerald God, Mama, and Animal Dreaming to name just a few. To me they also had connotations of melted plastic, almost as if the sculptures of Show Court 3 had dissolved into the glassy surface of a transparent tennis court.

      These are wonderfully evocative paintings. I really enjoyed spending time with them.

      Dr Marcus Bunyan

       

      1/ O’Neill, Jane. Louise Paramor: Show Court 3. Melbourne: Nellie Castan Gallery, 2009

      2/ Virilio, Paul. The Vision Machine. (trans. Julie Rose). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994, pp. 62-63


      Many thankx to Nellie Castan Gallery for allowing me to publish the photographs in the posting. Please click on the photographs for a larger version of the image.

       

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) 'Show Court 3 (VI)' 2009

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      Show Court 3 (VI)
      2009

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) 'Show Court 3' 2009 (detail)

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      Show Court 3 (detail)
      2009

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) 'Show Court 3' 2009 (detail)

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      Show Court 3 (detail)
      2009

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) Opening night crowd in front of 'Sky Pilot' (left) and 'Mama' (right) 2009

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      Opening night crowd in front of Sky Pilot (left) and Mama (right)
      2009
      Paint on glass

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) Opening night crowd in front of 'Green Eyed Monster' (right) and 'Sky Pilot' (right) 2009

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      Opening night crowd in front of Green Eyed Monster (right) and Sky Pilot (right)
      2009
      Paint on glass

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) Opening night crowd in front of 'Pineapple Express' 2009

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      Opening night crowd in front of Pineapple Express
      2009
      Paint on glass

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) 'A Dog and His Master' 2009 (detail)

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      A Dog and His Master (detail)
      2009
      Paint on glass

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) 'Lovers' 2009

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      Lovers
      2009
      Paint on glass

       

      Dale Frank (Australian, b. 1959) '2. One conversation gambit you hear these days: 'Do you rotate?' An interesting change of tack? No suck luck. 'Do you rotate?' simply fishes for information about the extent of your collection. Do you have enough paintings to hang a different one in your dining room every month?' 2005

       

      Dale Frank (Australian, b. 1959)
      2. One conversation gambit you hear these days: ‘Do you rotate?’ An interesting change of tack? No suck luck. ‘Do you rotate?’ simply fishes for information about the extent of your collection. Do you have enough paintings to hang a different one in your dining room every month?
      2005

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) 'Mood Bomb' 2009

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      Mood Bomb
      2009
      Paint on glass

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) 'Slippery Slope' 2009 (detail)

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      Slippery Slope (detail)
      2009
      Paint on glass

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964) 'Green Eyed Monster' 2009 (detail)

       

      Louise Paramor (Australian, b. 1964)
      Green Eyed Monster (detail)
      2009
      Paint on glass

       

       

      Nellie Castan Gallery, Melbourne

      This gallery closed in December 2013

      LIKE ART BLART ON FACEBOOK

      Back to top